Perhaps you think it is odd that mankind spent thousands of years
wanting to go to the moon and now, after reportedly going there only
twice, we have not been back in over 34 years. In all this time no
permanent base or instrumentation has ever been established there;
no satellite or remote explorer has ever been sent there in the name
of scientific research. Perhaps you think it was strange that the
communications link to a mars satellite was turned off just before
the satellite reached mars, despite the fact that the primary
directive of the mission was to never turn off or lose that
communications link. Perhaps you think it downright bizarre that on
yet another mission to mars, after a two year wait, the pictures
transmitted back were released to the pubic eight hours late because
they had arrived at night and NASA personnel claimed they were all
asleep. What you may not have thought about is that since the time
of the moon missions many of the countries of the world have had no
new free to air television stations. It may sound trivial in
comparison but as the worlds primary source of information this
anomaly is far more sinister. Without competition in the
broadcasting industry the 'players' are free to ignore important
public interest stories such as those above and manipulate public
opinion. If memory serves, an fm radio station license was recently
tendered (auctioned off) by the Australian government which went for
70 million dollars. I could only guess how much a new free to air
television license would cost, but it would be substantially more
and would be far more than the actual cost of the equipment
necessary to run the station. Only a very small select group of
people in the country could afford such a price and those that could
are probably already media owners. This means that the same people
who control the industry continue to grow and real competition
becomes practically non-existent. If the cost of the license was
reduced to a reasonable amount and if licenses were issued liberally
then there would be a lot more people in a position to start their
own television station, though it still wouldn't be cheap. It is no
surprise that a limited number of television stations is actually
preferable by a reigning political party as it enables them to
easily control, by collaborating with the few media owners, the
actual content of the station and enforce media blackouts in which
all information is withheld from the public. This may be convenient
for a country at war but in practice it denies the people the right
to free speech and allows governments to engage in shady practices
without the people knowing about it.
Of course, as the internet grows and the speed of transmission
increases we can get a broader picture of the world from many
sources. But only if we exercise our right to choose non-mainstream
sites rather than going to the same old sources used by the
television stations themselves. Also bear in mind that everything
you do while surfing the internet can be seen by third parties and
possibly recorded so be careful what you choose to do. It may not
seem important to you at the moment as you may be a law abiding
citizen, but times change and so does mans law, so one day it may be
illegal to smoke cigarettes, drink alcohol or do something that is
very common now such as writing or publishing books for example. It
is interesting to note that when the Australian government recently
had a large promotion to sell licenses to broadcast unrestricted
media such as full length movies on the internet that absolutely
nobody brought one. I guess this means that the business community
feels that it will never be necessary to have one due to the
unrestricted nature of the internet.
If there were a more balanced media presentation on free to air
television we would be told about some of the scientifically
provable facts found in the Bible and other ancient books. We would
be told that while evolution is a well recognized fact in nature it
cannot account for the unbelievably fast development of mankind
which is currently explained away as a special case called step
evolution which has not occurred with any other species on the
planet. Darwin himself mentions repeatedly in his theory that there
should be a lot of evidence of transitional stages between the now
differentiated species we have today. The only other sound reason
that we have for the fully differentiated species, lack of fossil
evidence and the quick emergence of mankind is that a being existed
before mankind and created us using increasingly believable
technology. The Bible supports this but gets almost no coverage on
the mainstream television stations, except during the small hours of
Sunday morning when it is interpreted by misguided evangelists, so
in all seriousness I recommend that you read it for yourself. You
will find it a refreshing change from the clearly pagan
entertainment presented by the few television stations.
